The Wealth of Nations

I doubt any students to the elusive subject ofdivision of labour and freedom of trade (just witness
economics have actually read the ingeniousall the angry anti-WTO protests on TV) - and, for all
masterpiece of Adam Smith - "The Wealth ofhis ideas' relevance, we quarrel with Adam Smith.
Nations". I was tempted but, frankly, never have theRourke himself wittingly pointed out ample evidence
courage to test out my perseverance in ancientof confusion in Smith's thinking in the areas of price,
prose - though attracted by the ancient but timelessglobalization, taxation, and others to prove his point,
wisdom. So I was delighted to find "P.J.O'Rourke onof course in pursuit of his self-interest - for fame -
The Wealth of Nations" on a bookshelf in a NewLink'sbut rather craftily: "there is an admitted pleasure in
book store at Hong Kong International Airport, andwatching someone so much more intellectual than
did not hesitate for long to buy it.oneself going so intellectually wrong."
And it did not take me long to read through it, as IPlaying devil advocate, perhaps O'Rourke is taking
indeed was fascinated by the wise man's wisdom,Smith's intelligence too seriously. As much as I am
albeit through the contemporary author's somewhatfully convicted of the wise man's wisdom, I also
arbitrary excerpting of cut and paste. His wittycannot help but imagine that a factor to his
interpretation helps, despite all sophomoric jests.greatness has to do with the fact that he was the
But it took me even sooner to realize how ignorantlyfirst person to write comprehensively and
wrong it was to think of Adam Smith as all aboutinformatively on the subject before even it was
self-interest. Quite the contrary. It is enlightening tonamed as such - economics. But history provides
learn that he actually wrote "The Theory of Moralample examples to prove that the first person who
Sentiments" first, in which he explained what moralitystarted off doing something might not necessarily
is and how much it is in man's nature to be interestedended up being the one doing that thing best after all
in the fortune of others.(Tiger Woods is not a Scotsman). Perhaps people are
Perhaps what is most shockingly relevant to oursimply nostalgic about their "first" knowledge or
current age of financial fiasco is, quoting P.J.O'Rourke,recognizable experience of every kind - empire,
Adam Smith's "warning against betting too muchindustrial revolution, management theory, golf,
accumulation and employment of stock on themusic...as in first love.
red-hot housing market":And O'Rourke should blog (that is, if he has not
A dwelling house, as such, contributes nothing to thealready started doing so.) Not only are his quips, jests
revenue of its inhabitant...If it is to be let to a tenantand waggish comments fanciful for blogging, he is
for rent, as the house can produce nothing, theobviously an intelligent man with much to offer if he
tenant must always pay the rent out of some otherwill. In his own condescending words: "Freedom of
revenue...Though a house, therefore, may yieldspeech is wonderful, if you have anything to say. A
revenue to its proprietor...it cannot yield any to thesearch of the blogosphere reveals that hardly anyone
public, nor serve in the function of a capital, and thedoes." But as a blog is free for all to read, he may
revenue of the whole body of the people can nevernot do it. As in quarreling with Adam Smith, he asked
be in the smallest degree increased by it.of "gross domestic product" rather cheesily: "I am as
How prophetic these words from the wise mangrossly domestic as anyone. Where is the product?
were, and how portentous they were of theHow come all the goods and services flow out of my
contemporary subprime mortgage crisis, in fact anyincome instead of into it?"
crisis of house-price bubbles anywhere in history sinceAs to whether Adam Smith is in heaven or not,
his time!O'Rourke should be grateful for running absolutely no
But P.J.O'Rourke is correct in suggesting that none ofrisk of being sued for plagiarism, without the slightest
us take the axioms of Adam Smith as givens - evenchance of falling in the same fate as Steve van der
the simple basic principle that economic progressArk - the guy who wrote a lexicon to Harry Potter.
depends on basically the pursuit of self-interest,